Saturday, August 27, 2005

"Man" on display at zoo!

LONDON - Caged and barely clothed, eight men and women monkeyed around for the crowds Friday in an exhibit labeled "Humans" at the London Zoo.

"Warning: Humans in their Natural Environment" read the sign at the entrance to the exhibit, where the captives could be seen on a rock ledge in a bear enclosure, clad in bathing suits and pinned-on fig leaves. Some played with hula hoops, some waved.

Visitors stopped to point and laugh, and several children could be heard asking, "Why are there people in there?"

-------------

Well, the answer to that last question ought to provide ample room for evangelistic maneuver. What is the difference between humans and apes, or bears, or elephants? Answer that...and you're on your way to investigating the Imago Dei.

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Church membership idea

Update: My AgapePress column on this matter

What if we got tougher
? I thought this bit from Mark Krikorian from "The Corner" was interesting...could it be adapted for the local church?

I’m just now finishing the current version of the print NR (National Review), and the review of Priscilla Buckley’s memoir about NR says that early on, subscribers who angrily cancelled their subscriptions because of some perceived ideological deviation on the part of the magazine were threatened with not being allowed to re-subscribe. One particularly hard case had to beg for three months, finally writing to the WFB sister in charge of such things: “I surrender dear. Maureen, please, please resubscribe me. I promise to be good.” Note to Kathryn et al.: you think this kind of “No soup for you!” reverse psychology would help subscriptions?
OK - someone decides to leave church angry over the color of the carpet, or the bad ideas from the pulpit, or the ridiculous ideology of the Sunday School. "Fine - leave - but you are not coming back. The Baptists have 'once saved, always saved.' We have 'once storm off in a huff, always stormed off in a huff (never to return).'"

Would it make 'em think twice? Maybe not, but actually, I am reminded that one of the lessons of much research in past years is that "churches that demand more of their membership, on the whole, grow more because of their demands."

So - leave at your own risk, ye great saints of God! Yes? Or, at least, should we rethink "standards" and discipline?

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

New poll - good people can gain salvation according to "evangelicals"

We continue to "water it down." And our biggest problem, or so it would seem, is not external but internal. Indeed, we are watered down...and everything goes.
One of the central tenets of evangelical Christianity is that to be saved—to earn admission into heaven—you must accept Jesus Christ as your savior. Yet 68% of “born again” or “evangelical” Christians say that a “good person who isn’t of your religious faith” can gain salvation, according to a new Newsweek/Beliefnet poll.

This is pretty amazing. Evangelicals are among the most churchgoing and religiously attentive people in the United States, and one of the ideas they’re most likely to hear from the minister at church on a given Sunday is that the path to salvation is through Jesus. Apparently, rank-and-file evangelicals have a different view."

Nationally, 79% of those surveyed said the same thing, and the figure is 73% for non-Christians and an astounding 91% among Catholics. The Catholics surveyed seemed more inclined to listen to the Catechism's precept that those who "seek the truth" may gain salvation—rather than, say, St. Augustine's view that being "separated from the Church" will damn you to hell "no matter how estimable a life he may imagine he is living.”

Pat, Pat...

We know, in Christian tradition, there is such a thing as a Just War. But is there such a thing as Just Assassination? And if there is, should Pat Robertson be calling for it?

Good grief.

Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson called on Monday for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, calling him a "terrific danger" to the United States.

Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition of America and a former presidential candidate, said on "The 700 Club" it was the United States' duty to stop Chavez from making Venezuela a "launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism."

Chavez has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics of President Bush, accusing the United States of conspiring to topple his government and possibly backing plots to assassinate him. U.S. officials have called the accusations ridiculous.

"You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it," Robertson said. "It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... and I don't think any oil shipments will stop."

Monday, August 22, 2005

A stunning finding from church growth research

Christian Schwarz was asked what surprised him most in his research on church health/growth. He said this:
"That, on average, the smaller churches are the better churches. To say it in a simplified way" 'The larger, the worse.' This pattern is so significant that it is difficult to see why no one else has come across this pattern. Instead some authors even proceed from the opposite thesis, namely "The bigger, the better."

This comes from the Schwarz/Schalk volume The Implementation Guide to Natural Church Development. Now this is only a pattern, but he goes further to suggest what churches of 100 to 200 can do to make the most effective contribution possible to world evangelization. We'll get to that later this week...

Thursday, August 18, 2005

Wow...

Just check it out and see if you can keep from being annoyed. Put out by a group called "Christian Aid."

The Harry Potter VBS?

Still an Old Geezer here. Really old, apparently. Those of you who weren't with me on The Matrix will be with me on this - won't you?
A church in Carlisle has decided to use J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter tales in its Bible school. Saint John's Episcopal Church has doubled vacation Bible school enrollment since doing so. This summer the theme is "Wizards and Wonders: The Journey with Harry Potter," as preschoolers take flying lessons on miniature broomsticks at a makeshift Hogwarts School of Wizardry and Witchcraft. Older students play a game of Quidditch, and more than 100 youngsters get Bible verse in their daily owl mail. A minister said the Bible and the Harry Potter stories have what she calls "a slew of parallel lessons."
Does the church, or for that matter, the Bible, need Harry Potter? Call me "out of touch" all you want....but, no.

On the other hand, a mainline church found a way to grow. So - (ahem!) a very modified, "Hooray!"

Update: My AgapePress column on the topic.

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Always err, if you must, on the side of life

Sen. Frist said he recognizes that stem cell research is a tough issue. “I ask for understanding. I don’t know if I’m right,” he said.

Coverage of the Rotary Club speech, here.

This reminds me of Hillary Clinton. She said, years ago, something to the effect of "Who can be sure when life begins?" If you don't know, wouldn't you rather err on the side of life.

A good thought for Mr. Frist.

Liberals fleeing...to YOUR church?

From an Indianapolis Star book review of Dave Shiflett's "Exodus": Shiflett describes himself as "an itinerant Presbyterian" who sometimes attends a mainline Presbyterian church. He says that - surprise, surprise - Americans are fleeing liberal churches for conservative Christianity.

From his interviews with Episcopal priests who no longer believe basic Christian doctrines, he concluded that "these clerics are doing missionary work. They have considered God's ways, as revealed in their faith's Scriptures and traditions, and have found them wanting. They have a higher agenda to advance. This allows them to turn Holy Writ on its head: what was once forbidden becomes acceptable, if not celebrated; admonitions toward holy living suddenly become hate speech."

The result is that mainline churches have become so secularized that they have accepted society's culture.

The second part of the book tells us where those who are leaving mainline churches are going. He begins with the Catholic Church, which welcomes 200,000 adult converts in America in any given year. As one of his interviewees said, the Catholic Church "not only offers a sound liturgy but stands firm where other faiths no longer do. (It) deserves allegiance because it is a bulwark against a lot of the rotten things like euthanasia, abortion, and the devaluation of life."

Shiflett writes about the Rev. John McCloskey, head of Catholic Information Services in Washington, who has converted hundreds of people to Catholicism, including noted conservatives such as Al Regnery, Robert Bork and Robert Novak. His converts, McCloskey says, share a "voracious and insatiable appetite for books. I show them the intellectual beauty of the church through the great writings." He mentions 15 names of "great minds (who) have crossed over."

Shiflett acknowledges that Catholicism also "remains a warm home for some of the world's most vigorous leftists," and gives examples. But, he opines, "The dynamism is on the right."

Shiflett also has chapters on those who have accepted the Orthodox Church, the Southern Baptists and evangelical churches. He says that the Orthodox Church appeals to Protestants who like its "mysterious" liturgies and who can't accept the role of the papacy in Catholicism.

The Southern Baptist Convention is America's largest non-Catholic Christian group, with 16 million members, and growing. Shiflett says that this religion, too, was becoming liberal before conservatives conducted a purge. Today the stress is on the "inerrancy" of the Bible. Shiflett conducted interviews with two leaders of the Southern Baptists, R. Albert Mohler and Dr. Richard Land.

Well, then, the question is - are the liberals coming to your church and denomination? I confess, I don't think they are exactly flocking to mine. My family is Nazarene, previously Free Methodist, previously United Methodist. It was always thought by the Nazarenes, Wesleyans and Free Methodists that the more the United Methodist Church lost membership, the more the evangelical Wesleyan denominations would pick up their people.

I don't think that has happened to any great degree.

Why?

Catholicism and the Orthodox have certainly grown that way. Are we missing something?

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

This is one way to handle the "Seamands" problem...


A ministry wife wrote about the "Seamands" problem:

Do you know what I did last night to my own dear husband? I told him the news, then grabbed his rough face in my hands, looked him straight in the eyes, and said, “Don’t EVER do that to me.” I didn’t let his gaze go…no wiggle room. He assured me he wouldn’t. I waited a minute, grabbed it again, and said, “Don’t even THINK of doing this to me.” He agreed, and we went on to talk about it in our usual open manner.

I recognize as probably true the concept that Satan wishes to corrupt our ministers and leaders more than anyone else, but that doesn’t mean that godly men and women need to end up pathetic statistics. My husband and I make it a daily habit to spend time in prayer together, to talk about his counseling policies (no women alone), to hold each other accountable for our thoughts and actions. I make it a regular practice to make sure that I am the only woman in his heart and mind. I ask him about his secretaries, his counselees. He KNOWS I am going to ask, and he knows that I know him well enough to know if his spiritual life is drooping or if something isn’t right. Trust is essential to a marriage, but stupidity and blindness simply allow one to be easily deceived. Perhaps our seminaries need to more aggressively talk about this with our pastoral students…with a special session for spouses. (I’d love to teach THAT one!)

Well, she is on to it. And for whatever it is worth, I'd like to have her "teach THAT one" too!

Speechless

I am confounded, actually, as to what to say...

I am a teetotaler, but this one was too good to pass up. Monks make beer. Get their beer named, through no effort of their own, best in the world.

How do they respond? If the beer is not Christian, at least their response seems to have been...

Religious Conservatives watch more R-rated movies than liberals?

From a CT newsletter:
A recent story in Variety magazine addresses the movie-viewing habits of "religious" Americans, and it was especially interesting to read about attitudes regarding R-rated films.

The study, co-sponsored by Variety and MarketCast, was reportedly commissioned to get a better feel for the public debate about the effect of movies on our nation's moral climate. They wanted to find out whether religious conservatives, typically the most vocal group when it comes to Hollywood's "value system," were putting their money where their mouth is. More specifically, were religious conservatives griping about hyper-violent and sexual R-rated movies … but going to see them anyway?

Seems the answer to that question is yes. Not necessarily a resounding yes, but according to the story, "the religious and the nonreligious … were nearly indistinguishable in their attitudes about their own individual moviegoing experience."

Some of the specific findings:
  • 25 percent of the "very religious" have seen movies rated R for their sexual content, compared to 33 percent of the "nonreligious"

  • 19 percent of the "very religious" have seen movies rated R for their violent content, compared to 28 percent of the "nonreligious"
Another interesting statistic comes from within the subcategory of the "religious," regarding their viewing of violent R-rated films. Of the "religious" folk, 29 percent of those calling themselves "conservative" have seen the violent R movies, compared to only 19 percent of the "liberal" ones. So, conservatives seem to be more into violence than liberals. Hmmm.

------------

Matt
: my denominational manual quotes Susannah Wesley for such purposes: "whatever weakens your reason, impairs the tenderness of your conscience, obscures your sense of God, or takes off the relish of spiritual things, whatever increases the authority of your body over mind, that thing for you is sin."

Prager defends Dobson

Columnist Dennis Prager is good. Real good. And for whatever reason I have found that the "Top Ten" columnists list of this nation has substantially been made up of conservative Jews (Prager, Feder, Jacoby). But they are good insomuch as they can say some things with a more impressive splash than can evangelicals:
Jews must not allow their desire to protect the integrity of the Holocaust, let alone their historical fear of Christianity and the Right, to blind them to the reality that their best friends today are indeed Christians and conservatives. One of whom is James Dobson, who said nothing wrong. Read the whole thing...

Monday, August 15, 2005

The Priesthood and Keanu


OK. Alright. Fine. I am an Old Geezer. But I never knew it quite so painfully as I knew it today when I found out that The Matrix and Keanu Reeves as an image are being used to woo young men into the priesthood.

Is something wrong here? Or am I, as I said, just middle-aged and careening towards irrelevance with every passing minute.

Oh, please, let it be the former.

Saturday, August 13, 2005

Another minister fails the test

Update: My AgapePress column.

Dr. David Seamands, who many in our seminary count as one of the greatest influences of our lives, was in a long-term relationship with a woman not his wife during his pulpit ministry at the United Methodist church in Wilmore, Kentucky from the early '60s through the early '80s. He later served as a professor at Asbury Theological Seminary.

Seamands has sold millions of books and helped countless thousands with his counseling, his preaching tapes that were sent around the world, his evangelical leadership in his mainline denomination and his seemingly pillar-like faith.

So - this shocks.

As I was surfing the net the other night I came across this quote from this site:

At some point during my seminary experience, I vividly remember being shocked by a statement from well-known UM pastor David Seamands. He had taken a bunch of us young, soon-to-be preachers aside and made one of the more outlandish statements I had ever heard: “The moment you answered the call to preach, you reduced your odds of going to heaven by at least fifty per cent.”

Both because of its bizarre nature and because of my huge respect for David Seamands, his off-the-wall comment seared itself into my memory. When he shared that audacious statement back in the ’70s, I had no point of reference for understanding what he meant. But now, 23-plus years later, I realize that this was a deadly accurate assessment of the very real and serious spiritual dangers inherent to ministry.
This was a provocative thought that came out before anyone knew about Seamand's "scandal." How prophetic.

A sad day for the Church, for Methodism, for those of us who love Seamands and for the millions impacted by his ministry who look back today and say, "Huh?"

Friday, August 12, 2005

Hooray for full churches? Or not...

Here is an article that is both provocative, and challenging. What if our churches are empty, but full? Hmmmm.
"In Europe, mass religious apostasy left its churches people-free, but the American megachurch could bring this irony: We, unlike the Europeans, have people in our big, empty churches."

The challenge of "empty churches"—even those that are packed with people—deserves attention.

Part of the problem is what sociologist and megachurch pastor Leith Anderson calls "generic Christianity." He points out that today, one can go into a church (especially a megachurch) of nearly any denomination—Baptist, Presbyterian, Pentecostal, Wesleyan, Lutheran—and be unable to notice any difference among them. They all are likely to use the same praise songs and contemporary worship style. The sermons will tend to be about practical biblical tips for successful living, and go light on doctrine and sin. Also, all of these different denominations tend to use Sunday-school curriculum and other material from the same nondenominational publishers. These companies purposefully avoid all controversial issues and doctrinal distinctives, which would limit their market share.

What better two things for someone wishing to "publish His mercy to the world."

These are great attributes for those who want to share their faith. And a great article on C.S. Lewis.
"But whenever he sat down to write, he brought two things to the task. As Markos phrases it, Lewis 'understood both the heart that yearns for God and the mind that seeks to know him.'''

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Planned Parenthood...proving themselves to be, again, a real "class" bunch

From CT:

Pro-life groups are up in arms about a Planned Parenthood cartoon that shows an abstinence educator being drowned in a trash can, pro-life picketers being shot at and blown up, a pro-life senator being boiled in oil, and another pro-life picketer being decapitated by a flying condom. The video was produced by Planned Parenthood Golden Gate in San Francisco.

"It is a promotion of violence against Christians and against pro-lifers," says Jim Sedlak, executive director of American Life League's Stopp International, which exists solely to oppose Planned Parenthood. "They call on pro-lifers to tame down our rhetoric because it incites violence, and then they not only produce this video but they put it on the front page of their website," said Sedlak, whose organization was among the first to respond to the video.

The video was taken off the Planned Parenthood Golden Gate website Tuesday, but at press time is still available at one of the creator's websites.

Other pro-life groups are also upset by the cartoon.

"NARAL is doing ads blasting John Roberts and accusing him of promoting violence in abortion clinics, which he has not," says Pia de Solenni, director of life and women's issues at Family Research Council. "And at the same time you have Planned Parenthood clearly promoting violence against anyone that thinks differently than they do. The irony is just striking."

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Nice site


For those of you as crazy about the Chronicles of Narnia by C.S. Lewis as is the Friedeman family, this is your place. Nice.

Monday, August 08, 2005

Christianity on move in China...

When I see what is happening in China (politically oppressed) and in other places in the world (most economically depressed) where the gospel is on the move I wonder if our faith was ever designed to flourish where life is too easy. Places like...America and the West.

Just a thought.

There is no question that where God is blessing with a dramatic harvest seems to be places of hardship. Praise the Lord!

Follow Me!

And "I will make you fishers of men! " Wouldn't it be delightful it that meant for some heavy lifting? Reeeeal heavy lifting.

What makes for a good fisher of men do you suppose? My list:
  • Willingness
  • Boldness
  • Spirit-infilling
  • Boldness
  • Daily time in prayer, Word
  • Boldness
  • A vibrant relationship with Jesus
  • Boldness
Now, I recognize the list bends a little one way. That would be the way where my own personality needs fortification. And, by watching many of my fellow non-evangelizers in church they lack the same.

Courage!

A last word on Peter Jennings. Ouch!


This is Neal Boortz today on Peter Jennings and his addiction. Ouch! But probably good to say. Part of evangelism is getting people to make a great exchange...their thoughts, habits, world views, behavior for - God's. Spiritually, it makes sense. Physically, too.

You smokers -- you drug addicts out there -- don't forget to light up today on your way to work. After all, there's nothing quite like driving to work in that fresh morning air while filing your lungs with smoke. And when you and your smoking colleagues leave the office five times today to meet in your little leper colony outside to do your favorite drug, why don't you strike up a little conversation about Peter Jennings? Diagnosis to dead in four months. Just what are you going to be doing four months from now?

Thursday, August 04, 2005

Baseball's bungling/Matt's latest for AgapePress


Check it out.

"The biggest outrage this week in sports isn't that the Baltimore Oriole's Rafael Palmeiro had a positive steroid test for Stanozolol, as bad as that is. No, it's that Major League Baseball doesn't really care."

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

Pro-abortionists have got to be befuddled


Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- New polling data shows that young women between the ages of 18-29 are becoming more pro-life on the issue of abortion. According to a CBS/New York Times poll, 49% of 18-29 year old women believed that abortion should be "available to anyone who wants it" in 1993. In 2003 among the same age group, only 35% of respondents agreed. In 2005, only 28% of young women favored making abortion "available to anyone who wants it." Meanwhile, in 1993, 30% of female respondents in the 18-29 year old age group believed that abortion should be "available, but with stricter limits." By 2005, the number had risen to 40%. Some 19% of respondents in 1993 believed that abortion should be "not permitted." By 2005, the number had risen to 30%.

Monday, August 01, 2005

So...what's the dream?

Evangelism is selling a dream. (Guy Kawasaki)

And the dream is? To many, the dream is an added number to the attendance roster or notch on their "good news" gun.

But could the "dream" be:
  • God's heart jumping with joy?
  • A family tree saved because of regenerated leadership?
  • Spiritual gifts coming alive for the cause of the Great Commission?
  • Ten, fifty, a thousand others saved because of the testimony of this life?
  • New prayers of adoration uttered to a smiling Lord?
  • A life, finally, of integrity...of love, joy, peace, patience...
I like it...the "selling of a dream."

Overturning Roe won't matter much?

That is what this columnist says. She may be right.

But won't matter "much" might mean that only, say, there would be a million abortions instead of 1.3, 1.4 or 1.5 million per year. Not "much" difference. OK - but I would suggest that there not being an abortion clinic in Mississippi (and MS would ban them were Roe overturned) would mean that a thousand or more lives in this state alone would be saved (just, of course, a guesstimation). Access and proximity matter.

So, is that worth it? You bet it is.

Even so, let's look forward to the day when we can get a constitutional ban. Please, Lord Jesus.